Was a new Rav invited before the previous Rav resigned?

The sellers have been fabricating lies that the previous Rav resigned, and therefore they went ahead and hired a new Rav.

Furthermore, after being called to the task for hiring a new Rav without a member vote, they denied the hiring and claimed that it was only an idea.

Please see the images below, where you can clearly see that they officially invited a new Rav. Additionally, look closely at the dates of the invitation and the resignation. As you can see, the date on the invitation precedes the date of the resignation.

Is it any wonder then, that the current Rav ‘resigned’? He was forced out against his own, and his congregants, will.

(For the sake of privacy, we have blacked out the name of the current Rav.)